|  | ||
| 
                17³Ô¹Ï Academic Senate Minutes 
             
                March 22, 2004; 2:30 – 4:30 pm, Room 
                6712 
             
                Meeting was called to order at 2:36 p.m. 
             
                Bea Cashmore will be replaced by Janet 
                Spybrook and Mary Hawkins in Spring and Fall. 
             
                Consent calendar was approved. 
             
                Part-time faculty issues – Rich Storer discussed the various 
                activities FA has been engaged in to help advance issues and 
                increase benefits for part-time faculty. These include office 
                hours, health care, and comparable pay for comparable work. The 
                part-time equivalency (resolution) would roll PFE into base 
                funds, which will allow COLA and growth funds for part-time 
                pay. FA drew up part-time equivalence, including language to 
                gain support and bring issue to the board of governors. FA 
                noted that the percentage of classes taught by part-time 
                faculty is now equal or greater than 50%. FA has tried to 
                convince the State to hire more towards the 75/25 full-time / 
                part-time faculty ratio, rather than the current 50/50 ratio. 
             
                Motion: Proposal to support the resolution 
                passed with two abstentions. 
             
                Faculty speaker - Dolores Davison informed the Senate on the activities 
                related to faculty speaker. Included in the latest language was 
                the ability of faculty for nomination and self-nomination. One 
                faculty speaker nomination has moved to the student (services) 
                group. A motion to approve the resolution passed unanimously. 
             
                Faculty handbook – 
                Bernadine Fong and Warren Hurd 
             
                Bernadine Fong noted that the faculty 
                handbook was the only record of faculty practice and what is 
                covered during faculty orientation. If the plus/minus grading 
                issue is resolved at the April 19th board meeting it should be included in the 
                faculty handbook. Adding a cell-phone policy is another 
                possible inclusion. Stanford is now part of our service area as 
                well. The disclaimer issue was the principle topic discussed. 
                Language to the effect that “Faculty handbook was 
                reviewed but not written by Senate members” was 
                suggested. The Senate discussed language that would say the 
                handbook represented ‘best practice’ the document 
                has been reviewed by the Senate to update (better) faculty 
                practice. The faculty handbook is a descriptive document of 
                best practices. The faculty handbook is the primary document 
                that new faculty are given during orientation (aside from the 
                FA agreement) Senate represents faculty academic issues and 
                past practice. Faculty handbook covers what responsible faculty 
                do – it is a ‘normative document’. The 
                faculty handbook committee will go back discuss some of the 
                language. 
             
                Curriculum committee issues – Shirley Treanor Barker addressed 
                the senate on some recent curriculum issues. In particular, 
                some of our courses may not be transferring, even when they 
                have been articulated. Online education, in particular, may not 
                be accepted by some of our educational partners in the CSU and 
                UC system. General education issues have also been a focus of 
                recent curriculum committee activity that faculty should be 
                aware of. Shirley will provide a hyperlink to some recent 
                documents, including a list of classes that can be audited. 
                Parameters are also being developed for online, hybrid, and Web 
                enhanced courses. It was proposed that Shirley meet with the 
                Senate executive leaders to discuss some of these issues, and 
                also to increase the contact between the Senate and the 
                curriculum committee. In the online area, information regarding 
                student success rates, and gathering both student and faculty 
                perspectives of online education were suggested as important 
                areas of focus. 
             
                College Committees – Paul Starer will be circulating an urgent 
                message to college committees to see which committees are 
                active, what their charters are, their current membership, etc. 
                This information will be used to update a master committee 
                list, and those committees that are not active will be 
                disbanded. Eventually this information will be available 
                through the 17³Ô¹Ï Senate website. 
             
                Plus / minus grading – the plus / minus grading issue will be 
                discussed at the April 19th FHDA board meeting. Draft language will be 
                circulated as soon as we determine what that language has 
                become. 
             |  | |
|  |  |  |