|  | ||
| 
                17勛圖 Academic Senate Minutes 
             
                April 26, 2004; 2:30 – 4:30 pm, Room 
                6712 
             
                Amended May 17, 2004 
             
                Called to order at 2:37 pm. 
             
                The 17勛圖 Academic Senate is honored to 
                have the Board of Trustees visiting and observing the Senate 
                meeting.  We welcome Chancellor Martha Kanter, Hal 
                Plotkin, Sandy Hay, Betsey Bechtel, and Andrea Leiderman. 
                 Since this was not an annnounced Board meeting, the Board 
                would not be making any statements on any issue, in accordance 
                with the Brown Act. 
             
                Minutes for the April 12, 2004 meeting were 
                approved. 
             
                The consent calendar was approved 
                unanimously.   
                Action and Information Items: 
             
                Full-Time Obligation:  Paul Starer presented the letter from Jane 
                Enright where the particulars of the Golden Handshake and the 
                gap in full-time hiring was clearly spelled out.  (See 
                attached letter).  The Senate has been asked to approve 
                this delay in hiring to enable the Golden Handshake to proceed. 
                 Rich Hansen from the FA discussed in detail how the 
                process would work, how retirees are considered in the FT:PT 
                ratio, and that the Golden Handshake as presented would delay 
                hiring from the Spring of 2005 until the Fall of 2005. 
                 The concerns of the De Anza Senate were addressed in that 
                the Senates (both 17勛圖 and De Anza) would be contacted if, 
                in the future, the issues surrounding the proposed hiring plan 
                would be subject to change.  In the ensuing discussion, it 
                was made clear that the process of hiring could occur at any 
                time, and that any gaps in instructional quality would affect 
                the Spring, 2005 quarter only.  Financial concerns were 
                also raised, and addressed in that as a district, we would 
                receive Prop 98 funds, which are linked to the economy, so 
                there is the hope of increases in future funding.   
                Voting results:  Deferring full-time 
                hiring for the Spring 2005 in order for the Golden Handshake to 
                proceed: 
             
                 In favor of deferral:  12 
             
                 Opposed to deferral:  0 
             
                 Abstentions:       
                      2 
             
                Faculty Speaker: 
                 As of the 4/19/04 deadline, four persons were nominated: 
                 Natalia Menendez, Elizabeth Barkley, James Woolever, 
                Jamie Doll.  These faculty members were then asked for a 
                bio, and three of the four declined after the bios were 
                requested.  The ASFC deferred obtaining the bios to the 
                Senate.  Dolores will obtain the bios and provide them to 
                the ASFC for their consideration and vote and submission to the 
                commencement committee.  A proposal for changing the 
                requirements for prospective speakers was discussed, whereby 
                the Senate would provide the bios for the ASFC.  This may 
                encourage more faculty to be considered as speaker. 
             
                A vote was taken in favor of the Senate to 
                obtain the bios, and for all four names to be submitted to the 
                ASFC for consideration of Faculty Speaker for the 2004 
                Commencement: 
             
                 In favor:       11 
             
                 Not in favor:  1 
             
                 Abstention:    2 
             
                Academic Freedom:  Rich Morasci 
                presented preliminary information regarding this important 
                bill.  Discussion ensued regarding the Academic Bill of 
                Rights, proposed changes in the education code, and academic 
                freedom.  The item was tabled until the May 10th meeting 
                so that Rich may gather more information on this critical 
                issue. 
             
                Final Exam Schedule:  Several key 
                issues were presented:  1).  Online exams are 
                sometimes scheduled at the same time as “real 
                person” in class exams, creating conflict for many 
                studnets.  This needs to be studied further and clarified 
                to allow final exams to proceed in a more organized fashion. 
                 2).  Faculty need guidance regarding when final 
                exams may be held, and faculty obligation to be present and 
                hold their exams during the allotted time.   
                3).  Jan Kuersten (scheduling) is 
                retiring, and should have enough time to train a replacement so 
                that a wealth of corporate knowledge is not lost.  4). 
                 Finals are sometimes scheduled for days on which the 
                course does not normally meet, creating difficulty for work and 
                other schedules.  The administration is considering 
                changing the final exam schedule for the Fall of 2004. 
                 5).  Discussion of “dead week” 
                acceptable activities, concern for final exam 
                “creep”  (finals held during dead week) and 
                that more discussion is needed.   
                Senate Constitution:  Due to the 
                number of changes and the discussion that needs to take place 
                concerning these changes, a special senate session will be held 
                on Monday, May 3, 2004 for all those interested in discussing 
                the proposed changes.  The items to be addressed include 
                but are not limited to the following: 
             
                1.  The Senate elected positions are 
                changing, consideration of the merging of the popsitions of VP 
                with the Curriculum co-chair.  Is it advisable to go ahead 
                with the upcoming election until the changes in the 
                constitution are approved?  (Roxanne presented) 
             
                2.  Representation of the divisions in 
                the Senate – a change from a house of reps to a senate 
                (with only two persons per division, regardless of the size of 
                the division).  All divisions would now be allowed up to 
                two senators. (Andy presented, April also) 
             
                3.  Paul’s areas of potential 
                concern:   
                 a.  Curric co-chair and Senate 
                VP is same person.  Would the curric cmte approve 
             
                  of this?  Shirley (current 
                Curric co-chair) said curric cmte didn’t seem  
             
                  that concerned about it. 
             
                 b.  No more discrimination 
                between PT and FT faculty voting.  All faculty,  
             
                regardless of FT or PT status would have 
                their votes counted as one full vote (previously PT vote was 
                counted as a half vote) 
             
                4.  Dolores presented:  Proposed 
                increase of term length might raise discussion / concern. 
             
                5.  Ken presented:  Term limits? 
                 Paul responded that the issue is not closed to 
                discussion,  
             
                 but the item was declined for 
                incorporation into the constitution at this time.  
             
                 Bob- number of successive terms, 
                number of lifetime terms?   
                6.  Andy, Lauren:  Voting issues 
                – approval of issues by 2/3 of votes cast,  
             
                voting by proxy with proxy substitutions 
                submitted in writing 
             
                * 
                
             
                Diversity Survey:  Kim Chief Elk 
                presented the findings of an institutional research survey for 
                the 17勛圖 De Anza Community.  Three years were spent in 
                developing the survey which was distributed to students, 
                classified employees, faculty and administrators. 
                 Important findings included:  1)  A great 
                diversity of languages exist, 2)  The overall climate 
                score was 1.9 with “1” being the most positive, and 
                3) no statistical difference existed for ethnic, gender, sexual 
                orientation, or disability.  Areas for improvement were 
                also indicated, including 1) comfort with approaching teachers 
                outside the classroom, 2)  increased teacher sensitivity 
                to students needs,  3)  difficulties with the teacher 
                and language if English is not the main language spoken by the 
                student, and 4)  ways to assist students who have a 
                disability which poses a challenge to their learning.   In 
                the discussion period afterwards, Ken Horowitz mentioned that 
                at the board meeting of April 12, Raj Jesudasen presented to 
                the board a document bringing into question the accuracy and 
                interpretation of the data and the numbers in the survey. 
                 This challenge related primarily to the fact that some 
                (number unknown) of faculty and staff did not fill out the 
                survey for fear that they’d be identified.  Kim 
                Chief Elk responded that the challenge to the document was 
                noted, but that the information present in the challenge was 
                not accurate. 
             
                Minor Students Policy:  Rose Myers 
                presented to new policy regarding minors taking classes on 
                campus.  SB338 limits the enrollment of minors to high 
                school juniors and seniors only.  Other issues relating to 
                minors, including mandatory reporting of abuse, exposure to 
                R-rated material, etc, will be addressed in the future. 
                 The Senate was reminded that even though the student 
                might me a minor, the instructor cannot discuss any academic 
                issues, including performance and grades, with anyone except 
                the student (no discussion is allowed with the parents). 
             
                Committee Members needed:  ETAC needs a representative for the Spam 
                Committee.   
                The meeting adjourned at 4:34 
             
                Respectfully submitted: 
             
                Maureen Mac Dougall 
             
                Secretary/Treasurer 
             |  | |
|  |  |  |